Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Within-field variations in sugar beet yield and quality and their correlation with environmental variables in the East of England

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Mahmood, S. A. and Murdoch, A. J. (2017) Within-field variations in sugar beet yield and quality and their correlation with environmental variables in the East of England. European Journal of Agronomy, 89. pp. 75-87. ISSN 1161-0301 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.05.007

Abstract/Summary

Spatial variability of sugar beet yield and quality within fields and their correlation with environmental variables was investigated in order to explore the potential for more precise agronomy. In three uniformly-managed, commercial sugar beet fields in the east of England spatial variation in the commercial value of the sugar yield ranged from £232 to £3320 per hectare. This variation was not random; there were high and low yielding patches in each field. Sugar beet root yield was positively correlated with the spatial distribution of crop plant population, soil organic matter and soil moisture, but negatively with weed density and canopy temperature. Correlations of sugar beet yield with soil type, elevation and soil available phosphate, potassium and magnesium were, however, inconsistent between the three fields and over two seasons. With respect to sugar beet quality, spatial variation in the amino acid and potassium concentrations in the sugar beet roots was associated with soiltype and elevation, whereas sugar percentage varied randomly in two of the fields. Interventions and research that could help to optimize yield on a spatially-variable basis are discussed.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/71368
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Crop Science
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar