BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective

[thumbnail of DAINTY, LEIRINGER, FERNIE & HARTY (1).pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Dainty, A., Leiringer, R., Fernie, S. and Harty, C. (2017) BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective. Building Research & Information, 45 (6). pp. 696-709. ISSN 0961-3218 doi: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1293940

Abstract/Summary

The need for technological and administrative innovation is a recurrent theme in the UK construction-reform agenda, but generic improvement recipes are beginning to give way to a more focused prescription: building information modelling (BIM). The current strategy is to mandate the use of BIM for government projects as a way of integrating the design, construction and operation of publicly procured buildings. This aspiration represents a partial turn away from a focus on managerialist agendas towards a belief in the power of digital practices to achieve the aspiration of integrated working, collaboration and innovation, a trend that is being reflected globally in relation to both national and firm-level policy interventions. This paper subjects this so-called ‘BIM revolution’ to critical scrutiny. By drawing on theories of the digital divide, a critical discourse is developed around the ways in which political reform agendas centred on BIM might not stimulate innovation on a wider scale, but could act to disenfranchise small firms that are unable (or unwilling) to engage with them. This critical analysis presents important new research questions around the technocratic optimism that pervades the current reform discourse, the trajectory of industry development that it creates and the policy process itself.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/71305
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/09613218.2017.1293940
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Organisation, People and Technology group
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar