Francis, K. B., Howard, C., Howard, I. S., Gummerum, M., Ganis, G., Anderson, G. and Terbeck, S. (2016) Virtual morality: transitioning from moral judgment to moral action? PLoS ONE, 11 (10). e0164374. ISSN 1932-6203 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164374
Abstract/Summary
The nature of moral action versus moral judgment has been extensively debated in numerous disciplines. We introduce Virtual Reality (VR) moral paradigms examining the action individuals take in a high emotionally arousing, direct action-focused, moral scenario. In two studies involving qualitatively different populations, we found a greater endorsement of utilitarian responses–killing one in order to save many others–when action was required in moral virtual dilemmas compared to their judgment counterparts. Heart rate in virtual moral dilemmas was significantly increased when compared to both judgment counterparts and control virtual tasks. Our research suggests that moral action may be viewed as an independent construct to moral judgment, with VR methods delivering new prospects for investigating and assessing moral behaviour.
Altmetric Badge
| Additional Information | Re-published in January 2017 with a correction: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170133. |
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/70866 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0164374 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
| Additional Information | Re-published in January 2017 with a correction: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170133. |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download