Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Testing the current paradigm for space weather prediction with heliospheric imagers

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Barnard_et_al-2017-Space_Weather.pdf - Published Version (7MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Barnard, L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9876-4612, de Koning, C. A., Scott, C. J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6411-5649, Owens, M. J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-2453, Wilkinson, J. and Davies, J. A. (2017) Testing the current paradigm for space weather prediction with heliospheric imagers. Space Weather, 15 (6). pp. 782-803. ISSN 15427390 doi: 10.1002/2017SW001609

Abstract/Summary

Predictions of the arrival of four coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in geospace are produced through use of three CME geometric models combined with CME drag modeling, constraining these models with the available Coronagraph and Heliospheric Imager data. The efficacy of these predications is assessed by comparison with the Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) numerical MHD forecasts of these same events. It is found that such a prediction technique cannot outperform the standard SWPC forecast at a statistically meaningful level. We test the Harmonic Mean, Self-Similar Expansion, and Ellipse Evolution geometric models, and find that, for these events at least, the differences between the models are smaller than the observational errors. We present a new method of characterizing CME fronts in the Heliospheric Imager field of view, utilizing the analysis of citizen scientists working with the Solar Stormwatch project, and we demonstrate that this provides a more accurate representation of the CME front than is obtained by experts analyzing elongation time maps for the studied events. Comparison of the CME kinematics estimated independently from the STEREO-A and STEREO-B Heliospheric Imager data reveals inconsistencies that cannot be explained within the observational errors and model assumptions. We argue that these observations imply that the assumptions of the CME geometric models are routinely invalidated and question their utility in a space weather forecasting context. These results argue for the continuing development of more advanced techniques to better exploit the Heliospheric Imager observations for space weather forecasting.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/70775
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar