Address: Critical irony, neo-authenticity and humour in the art we call public

[thumbnail of 70157 Address Final.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Garnett, R. (2017) Address: Critical irony, neo-authenticity and humour in the art we call public. Art and the Public Sphere, 1 (6). pp. 69-79. ISSN 2042-793X doi: 10.1386/aps.6.1-2.69_1

Abstract/Summary

This text is a critical analysis of the term ‘public art’ and the often unquestioned assumptions that underpin the term’s still-extant currency, this in spite of the mani-fold shifts that have taken place in recent decades that, for me at least, render mori-bund any reductive oppositions between the ‘public’ and the ostensibly ‘private’. Attempting to go beyond the binary of ‘autonomous’, privatized domain of white-cube, ‘gallery art’ versus a putatively ‘socially engaged’ art within the broader domain of the public sphere, I will attempt to argue that the all-too-often elided dimension of the time of art, or art’s durationalty conceived of as spatio-temporal ‘scene-event’ might offer a productive means of exceeding the ossified public-private dialectic.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/70157
Identification Number/DOI 10.1386/aps.6.1-2.69_1
Refereed No
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Arts and Communication Design > Art > Fine Art
Publisher Intellect Journals
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar