Meta-commentary and mythology: "Episodes" as a performance of transatlantic TV

[thumbnail of BignellEpisodesTransatlantic.pdf]
Text - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bignell, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-1601 (2019) Meta-commentary and mythology: "Episodes" as a performance of transatlantic TV. In: Hills, M., Hilmes, M. and Pearson, R. (eds.) Transatlantic Television Drama: Industries, Programs and Fans. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 163-180. ISBN 9780190663124

Abstract/Summary

The chapter focuses on the comedy drama "Episodes" (2011-), created by the American writers Jeffrey Klarik and David Crane, and made by the British production company Hat Trick for the BBC (UK) and Showtime (USA). The programme's storyline is based the remaking of a British TV comedy in the USA, as well as having a hybrid identity as a transatlantic production. It can be read as a commentary on the similarities and differences between American and British television cultures. In other words, "Episodes" not only talks about transatlantic television, but self-consciously performs it. Rather than evaluating whether "Episodes" reflects real national differences and similarities, the chapter argues that it is a meta-commentary on deeply embedded myths about the TV of each nation.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/69134
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Arts and Communication Design > Film, Theatre & Television
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar