Against supersessionist thinking: old and new, Jews and postcolonialism, the ghetto and diaspora

[thumbnail of Permanent embargo]
Text (Permanent embargo) - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Cheyette, B. (2017) Against supersessionist thinking: old and new, Jews and postcolonialism, the ghetto and diaspora. The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 4 (3). pp. 424-439. ISSN 2052-2622 doi: 10.1017/pli.2017.31

Abstract/Summary

This essay focuses on the liberatory possibilities and political and disciplinary difficulties of bringing together Jewish and postcolonial studies. It begins and ends with Adorno’s critique of “actionism” in order to see what is lost when the clarity and certainty of political action is privileged over scholarly nuance and complexity (“praxis” over “theory”). This loss is surveyed through a set of related binaries (supersessionism, foundationalism, and disciplinarity), which, it is contended, reduces critical thinking to polemic and makes it all but impossible to explore interconnected Jewish and postcolonial histories. The argument is illustrated with reference to postcolonial literature and by examining the disciplining of postcolonial and memory studies in relation to the Holocaust. A way out of the binary impasse, it is suggested, is to utilize as “traveling concepts” transcultural and transnational histories (such as “diaspora” and “ghetto”) that Jewish and postcolonial studies have in common.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information For the author's response to responses to this article, see '"Enthusiast": A Response to the Responces', at https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2017.48 also http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78521/
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/68979
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/pli.2017.31
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Literature
Additional Information For the author's response to responses to this article, see '"Enthusiast": A Response to the Responces', at https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2017.48 also http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78521/
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar