Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Payment vs. compensation for ecosystem services: do words have a voice in the design of environmental conservation programs?

Full text not archived in this repository.
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clot, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4964-825X, Grolleau, G. and Méral, P. (2017) Payment vs. compensation for ecosystem services: do words have a voice in the design of environmental conservation programs? Ecological Economics, 135. pp. 299-303. ISSN 0921-8009 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.028

Warning
There is a more recent version of this item available.

Abstract/Summary

We examine whether and how word choice can affect individual perceptions about a proposed Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) program when objective outcomes are similar. From a traditional economic perspective, this type of manipulation would be considered unlikely to affect perceptions and behaviour, especially in the presence of pecuniary incentives and repeated decisions among sophisticated agents. From a behaviourally informed perspective, however, psychological and political theories of wording argue that word choice can have a significant impact on economic behaviour. To substantiate this discussion, we conduct a survey experiment that tests the impact of the words ‘payment’ and ‘compensation’ on favorability ratings of a proposed PES program. These preliminary findings suggest that the words used to describe public policies can be influential non-pecuniary interventions.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/68491
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Available Versions of this Item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar