Stake effects on ambiguity attitudes for gains and losses

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of 01_ambiguity_stakes.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bouchouicha, R., Martinsson, P., Medhin, H. and Vieider, F. (2017) Stake effects on ambiguity attitudes for gains and losses. Theory and Decision, 83 (1). pp. 19-35. ISSN 1573-7187 doi: 10.1007/s11238-016-9585-5

Abstract/Summary

We test the effect of stake size on ambiguity attitudes. Compared to a baseline condition, we find subjects to be more ambiguity seeking for small- probability gains and large-probability losses under high stakes. They are also more ambiguity averse for large-probability gains and small-probability losses. We trace these effects back to stake effects on decisions under risk (known probabilities) and uncertainty (unknown probabilities). For risk we replicate previous findings. For uncertainty, we find an increase in probabilistic insensitivity under high stakes that is driven by increased uncertainty aversion for large-probability gains and for small-probability losses.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/68380
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s11238-016-9585-5
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar