Vieider, F. M. (2018) Certainty preference, random choice, and loss aversion: a comment on "Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan". American Economic Review, 108 (8). pp. 2366-2382. ISSN 0002-8282 doi: 10.1257/aer.20160789
Abstract/Summary
I revisit recent evidence uncovering a preference for certainty in violation of dominant normative and descriptive theories of decision making under risk. I explore two alternative explanations of the preference patterns found: i) systematic noise; and ii) reference dependence activated by salient outcomes. I develop choice lists that allow to disentangle these different explanations, and test them on rural subjects in southern India. The results reject explanations based on a preference for certainty in favor of explanations based on random choice. The estimates are further distorted by response mode effects, with loss aversion leading to an over-estimation of risk aversion.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/68354 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1257/aer.20160789 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics |
| Uncontrolled Keywords | certainty effect, loss aversion, random choice, risk preferences |
| Publisher | American Economic Association |
| Publisher Statement | Copyright & Permissions Copyright © 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 by the American Economic Association. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of American Economic Association publications for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not distributed for profit or direct commercial advantage and that copies show this notice on the first page or initial screen of a display along with the full citation, including the name of the author. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than AEA must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. The author has the right to republish, post on servers, redistribute to lists and use any component of this work in other works. For others to do so requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Permissions may be requested from the American Economic Association Administrative Office by going to the Contact Us form and choosing "Copyright/Permissions Request" from the menu. |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download