Prediction markets, social media and information efficiency

[thumbnail of bigotgate_151215.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Vaughan Williams, L. and Reade, J. J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-530X (2016) Prediction markets, social media and information efficiency. Kyklos, 69 (3). pp. 518-556. ISSN 1467-6435 doi: 10.1111/kykl.12119

Abstract/Summary

We consider the impact of breaking news on market prices. We measure activity on the micro-blogging platform Twitter surrounding a unique, newsworthy and identifiable event and investigate subsequent movements of betting prices on the prominent betting exchange, Betfair. The event we use is the Bigotgate scandal, which occurred during the 2010 UK General Election campaign. We use recent developments in time series econometric methods to identify and quantify movements in both Twitter activity and Betfair prices, and compare the timings of the two. We find that the response of market prices appears somewhat sluggish and is indicative of market inefficiency, as Betfair prices adjust with a delay, and there is evidence for post-news drift. This slow movement may be explained by the need for corroborating evidence via more traditional forms of media. Once important Tweeters begin to Tweet, including importantly breaking news Twitter feeds from traditional media sources, prices begin to move.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/66748
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/kykl.12119
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar