The development of building assessment criteria framework for sustainable non-residential buildings in Saudi Arabia

Downloads

•Abdalla, G., Maas, G., Huyghe, J., Oostra, M. 2011. 'Criticism on environmental assessment tools', 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, IPCBEE. •Ali, H., Al Nsairat, S., 2009. Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan. Building and Environment. 44(5), 1053-1064. •Alwaer, H., Clements-Croome, D., 2010. Building sustainability awards 2010- sustainable innovation of the year. Hilson Moran. •Alyami, S. H., Rezgui, Y., 2012. Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. 5(0), 52-62. •Attia, M. K. M., 2013. LEED as a tool for enhancing affordable housing sustainability in Saudi Arabia: The case of Al-Ghala project. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 2(3), 224-250. •AUPC (2010a) Pearl Building Rating System for Estidama: Design and Construction (1). •AUPC, 2010b. Pearl building: Guide for consultant. Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council. •BP, 2014. BP statistical review of world energy june 2014. 63rd edn. BP p.l.c, London. •BRE (2011) BREEAM New Construction: Non- Domestic Buildings (Technical Manual SD5073-2.0:2011). Watford. •BRE 2015. Background to the Green Guide to Specification: Methodology and Sponsors. Available at: Building Research Establishment Ltd. •http://www.bre.co.uk/greenguide/page.jsp?id=2069 (Accessed: 20.11). •Chandratilake, S. R., Dias, W. P. S., 2013. Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations. Energy. 59(0), 22-28. •Chen, Y., Yu, J., Khan, S., 2010. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling & Software. 25(12), 1582-1591. •Cole, R., 1998. Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research & Information. 26(1), 3-16. •Cole, R., 1999. Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions. Building Research & Information. 27(4-5), 230-246. •Darus, Z. M., Hashim, N. A., Salleh, E., Haw, L. C., Rashid, A. K. A., and Manan, S. N. A. 2009. 'Development of rating system for sustainable building in Malaysia', WSEAS Transactions on Environment and development. pp. 260-272. •Ding, G., 2008. Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management. 86(3), 451-464. •Dirlich, S., 2011. A comparison of assessment and certification schemes for sustainable building and suggestions for an international standard system. IMRE Journal. 5(1), 1-12. •Dixon, T., Colantonio, A., Shiers, D., Gallimpre, P., Reed, R., Wilkinson, S., 2007. A green profession: An audit of sustainability tools, techniques and information for rics members,. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. •Fasiuddin, M., Budaiwi, I., 2011. HVAC system strategies for energy conservation in commercial buildings in Saudi Arabia. Energy and Buildings. 43(12), 3457-3466. •Forsberg, A., Von Malmborg, F., 2004. Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment. Building and Environment. 39(2), 223-228. •Franzoni, E., 2011. Materials Selection for Green Buildings: which Tools for Engineers and Architects? Procedia Engineering. 21(0), 883-890. •GBCA 2012. Green Star overview. Available at: Green Building Council Australia ,http://www.gbca.org.au/green-star/green-star-overview/ (Accessed: 06.01). •Goh, C. S., Rowlinson, S. 2013. 'The roles of sustainability assessment systems in delivering sustainable construction', Procs 29th Annual ARCOM Conference. Reading, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 1363-1371. •GORD, 2012. GSAS/QSAS Technical Guide. Gulf Organization for Research & Development. •Haapio, A., Viitaniemi, P., 2008a. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 28(7), 469-482. •Ho, W., 2008. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research. 186(1), 211-228. •John, V. M. 2011. 'Sustainable Construction, Innovation and Durability: Trends and Research Needs', International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. Porto, Portugal, April 12th - 15th. p. 7. •Kajikawa, Y., Inoue, T., Goh, T., 2011. Analysis of building environment assessment frameworks and their implications for sustainability indicators. Sustainability Science. 6(2), 233-246. •Kawazu, Y., Shimada, N., Yokoo, N., Oka, T. (2005a) Proceedings of the Sustainable Building Conference (SB05), Tokyo, Japan. •Kawazu, Y., Shimada, N., Yokoo, N., Oka, T. 2005b. 'Comparison of the assessment results of BREEAM, LEED, GBTool and CASBEE', Proceedings of the Sustainable Building Conference (SB05), Tokyo, Japan. pp. 1700- 1705. •Kurek, J., 2007. King Abdullah financial district. Henning larsen architects. 1-7. •Lahn, G., Stevens, P. 2011. '1-36', Burning oil to keep cool: The hidden energy crisis in saudi arabia. Available at: http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Energy,%20Environment%20and%20Development/1211pr_lahn_stevens.pdf. •Lee, W., 2013. A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes. Energy and Buildings. 62, 403-413. •Lee, W., Chau, C., Yik, F., Burnett, J., Tse, M., 2002. On the study of the credit-weighting scale in a building environmental assessment scheme. Building and Environment. 37(12), 1385-1396. •Mao, X., Lu, H., Li, Q. 2009. 'A comparison study of mainstream sustainable/green building rating tools in the world', Management and Service Science, 2009. MASS '09. International Conference on. 20-22 Sept. 2009. IEEEE, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/icmss.2009.5303546. •Rahardjati, R., Khamidi, F., Idrus, A. 2010. 'The Level of Importance of Criteria and Sub Criteria in Green Building Index Malaysia', International Conference on Sustainable Building and Infrastructure (ICSBI 2010). Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, June 2010. pp. 15-17 •Reed, R., Bilos, A., Wilkinson, S., Schulte, K., 2009. International comparison of sustainable rating tools. JOSRE. 1(1), 1 - 22. •Reed, R., Wilkinson, S., Bilos, A., Schulte, K. 2011. 'A comparison of international sustainable Building tools- An Update', The 17th Annual Pacific Rim Real Society Conference. Gold Coast, 16-19 January pp. 1- 15. •Reijnders, L., van Roekel, A., 1999. Comprehensiveness and adequacy of tools for the environmental improvement of buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production. 7(3), 221-225. •Rosa, L. V., Haddad, A. N., 2013. Assessing the sustainability of existing buildings using the analytic hierarchy process. American Journal of Civil Engineering. Vol 1(1), 24-30. •Saaty, T., 1990. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarch Process. European Journal of Operational Research. 48, 9-26. •Saaty, T. L., 2003. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research. 145(1), 85-91. •Saaty, T. L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 1(1), 83-98. •Saaty, T. L., Sodenkamp, M. 2010 'The analytic hierarchy and analytic network measurement processes: The measurement of intangibles', in Zopounidis, C. and Pardalos, P. M. (eds.) Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 91-166. 4. •SGBC 2011. Saudi Green Building Council. Available at: http://www.saudigbc.com/. •Shaawat, M. E., Jamil, R., 2014. A guide to environmental building rating system for construction of new buildings in saudi arabia. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research. 19(2), 47-56. •Sinou, M., Kyvelou, S., 2006. Present and future of building performance assessment tools. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 17 (5), 570 - 586. •Sleeuw, M., 2011a. A comparison of BREEAM and LEED environmental assessment methods. University of East Anglia Estates and Buildings Division, Norwich. •Sleeuw, M. (2011b) A comparison of BREEAM and LEED environmental assessment methods. Norwich. [Online]. Available at: https://www.uea.ac.uk/estates/environmentalpolicy/BREEAM+vs+LEED?mode. •Suzer, O., 2015. A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems. Journal of Environmental Management. 154(0), 266-283. •Terry, A., Moore, T., Casey, M., Andrew, P., Hosking, P., King, T. A., Roussac, C., Raina, D., Hansen, R., McDonald, T., Jackson, S. (2008) 'Waste and sustainable commercial buildings'. http://www.yourbuilding.org/Article/NewsDetail.aspx?p=83&id=1567. Available at: http://www.yourbuilding.org/Article/NewsDetail.aspx?p=83&id=1567. •Todd, J., Crawley, D., Geissler, S., Lindsey, G., 2001. Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the Green Building Challenge. Building Research & Information. 29(5), 324-335. •Tzeng, G.-H., Huang, J.-J., 2011. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Taylor & Francis Group, Florida. •USGBC (2009) LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations Rating System With Alternative Compliance Paths For Projects Outside the U.S. Washington, DC •Venkatarama Reddy, B. V., Jagadish, K. S., 2003. Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy and Buildings. 35(2), 129-137. •Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., Zhao, J.-H., 2009. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 13(9), 2263-2278. •Yang, Y., Li, B., Yao, R., 2010. A method of identifying and weighting indicators of energy efficiency assessment in Chinese residential buildings. Energy Policy. 38(12), 7687-7697.