The privilege against self-incrimination in truth commission administered accountability initiatives

[thumbnail of The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in Truth Commission Administered Accountability Initiatives Feb16.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bisset, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-3827 (2017) The privilege against self-incrimination in truth commission administered accountability initiatives. Leiden Journal of International Law, 30 (1). pp. 155-176. ISSN 1478-9698 doi: 10.1017/S0922156516000613

Abstract/Summary

In recent times, transitional justice practice has increasingly seen truth commissions tasked with administering accountability programmes, distinct from and in addition to their traditional truth-seeking role. Such accountability schemes typically take the form of granting or recommending amnesty for those who disclose involvement in past crimes or facilitating reintegration on the basis of similar disclosures. Self-incriminating disclosures made in the course of traditional truth commission proceedings generally attract a robust set of legal safeguards. However, the protections within transitional accountability schemes administered by truth commissions tend to be less stringent. This article explores this anomaly, focusing particularly on the extent to which the privilege against self-incrimination is protected within truth commission administered accountability programmes. It considers the programmes operated to date, and the levels of protection afforded, and demonstrates a lack of consistent practice in the safeguarding of individual rights within these programmes. It examines international legal standards on the privilege against self-incrimination and questions whether the procedures operated by accountability programmes can be reconciled with international norms in order to protect those who make self-incriminating disclosures within accountability initiatives. The article argues that a failure to ensure individual rights against self-incrimination risks compromising the efficacy of the programmes themselves and the contribution that they can make to long term peace and reconciliation in transitional states.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/66019
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/S0922156516000613
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar