The role of subsidy in ensuring the sustainability of small-scale anaerobic digesters in Odisha, India

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

York, L., Heffernan, C. and Rymer, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-4330 (2016) The role of subsidy in ensuring the sustainability of small-scale anaerobic digesters in Odisha, India. Renewable Energy, 96. pp. 1111-1118. ISSN 0960-1481 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.064

Abstract/Summary

Small-scale anaerobic digester installation has been a development objective of the Indian government to provide rural households clean fuel. Anaerobic digester installation is heavily subsidised. Depending on caste, the rate of subsidy offered for the smallest system available (1m3) varies between 32.35% and 41.18% of the total installation price. Yet, there are gaps in knowledge regarding the usefulness of such subsidies from a sustainability perspective. A cost-benefit analysis was conducted to evaluate the circumstances required for digester sustainability. The analysis used household data collected from 115 cattle owning households in Odisha, India to evaluate profitability at three levels of subsidy (none, General caste subsidy, and Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribe subsidy). Additional analyses considered the effect of; taking a loan, replacing electric lighting with biogas lighting, and the wealth level of the household. The results indicated that access to subsidy improved profitability. Yet, profitability could be achieved without the use of subsidy. The level of benefit accrued by households was similar independent of wealth. However, the provision of subsidy was essential for ensuring profitability for those households required to take a loan to meet the expense of installation. Such findings highlight the importance of subsidy as a means of including the poor.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/61780
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.064
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Centre for Food Security
Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Animal Sciences > Animal, Dairy and Food Chain Sciences (ADFCS)- DO NOT USE
Uncontrolled Keywords biogas, cost-benefit analysis, manure, dairy, smallholder, sustainability
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar