van den Berg, M. and Donyai, P.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-6170
(2010)
A retrospective audit of medicines use review forms.
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 18 (S1).
pp. 33-34.
ISSN 0961-7671
doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00027.x
Abstract/Summary
The medicines use review (MUR) service was introduced in England and Wales in 2005 to improve patients’ knowledge and use of medicines through a private, patient–pharmacist consultation. The pharmacist completes a standard form as a record of the MUR consultation and the patient receives a copy. The 2008 White Paper, Pharmacy in England[1] notes some MURs are of poor or questionable quality and there are anecdotal reports that pharmacists elect to conduct ‘easy’ MURs with patients on a single prescribed medicine only.[2] In 2009, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (RPSGB) launched a multi-disciplinary audit template to review the effectiveness of MURs and improve their quality.[3] Prior to this, we conducted a retrospective MUR audit in a 1-month period in 2008. Our aims were to report on findings from this audit and the validity of using MUR forms as data for audit.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/5926 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00027.x |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > School of Pharmacy > Pharmacy Practice Research Group |
| Publisher | Wiley InterScience |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download