Intermittent exotropia: are we underminusing by not overminusing?

[thumbnail of JAAPOS AH authors final accepted.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Brodsky, M. C., Horwood, A. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0886-9686 and Riddell, P. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-2057 (2015) Intermittent exotropia: are we underminusing by not overminusing? Journal of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 15 (5). pp. 397-398. ISSN 1091-8531 doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.05.011

Abstract/Summary

In this invited commentary, the authors discuss whether the use of minus lenses to aid control of intermittent exotropia has an alternative method of action. Conventional theory suggests that the lenses induce accommodation and therefore accommodative convergence to reduce the angle of deviation. We discuss evidence which suggests that convergence is induced to control the primary deviation and that the minus lenses allow this control by correcting refractive blur caused by additional vergence accommodation.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/55572
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.05.011
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Development
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar