Reverse correlation reveals how observers sample visual information when estimating three-dimensional shape

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Scarfe, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3587-6198 and Hibbard, P. B. (2013) Reverse correlation reveals how observers sample visual information when estimating three-dimensional shape. Vision Research, 86. pp. 115-127. ISSN 0042-6989 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.016

Abstract/Summary

Human observers exhibit large systematic distance-dependent biases when estimating the three-dimensional (3D) shape of objects defined by binocular image disparities. This has led some to question the utility of disparity as a cue to 3D shape and whether accurate estimation of 3D shape is at all possible. Others have argued that accurate perception is possible, but only with large continuous perspective transformations of an object. Using a stimulus that is known to elicit large distance-dependent perceptual bias (random dot stereograms of elliptical cylinders) we show that contrary to these findings the simple adoption of a more naturalistic viewing angle completely eliminates this bias. Using behavioural psychophysics, coupled with a novel surface-based reverse correlation methodology, we show that it is binocular edge and contour information that allows for accurate and precise perception and that observers actively exploit and sample this information when it is available.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/54989
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.016
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar