English history teachers’ views on what substantive content young people should be taught

[thumbnail of JSC HA survey paper - not for review - modified - 1.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Appendices.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Tables.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Harris, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-5515 and Burn, K. (2016) English history teachers’ views on what substantive content young people should be taught. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48 (4). pp. 518-546. ISSN 1366-5839 doi: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1122091

Abstract/Summary

Public and policy discourse about the content of history curricula is frequently contested, but the voice of history teachers is often absent from such debate. Drawing on a large scale on-line survey of history teachers in England, this paper explores their responses to major curriculum reforms proposed by the Coalition government in February 2013. In particular it examines teachers' responses to government plans to prescribe a list of topics, events and individuals to be taught chronologically that all students would be expected to study. Nearly 550 teachers responded to the survey, and more than two-thirds of them provided additional written comments on the curriculum proposals. This paper examines these comments, with reference to a range of curriculum models. The study reveals a deep antagonism towards the proposals for various reasons, including concerns about the extent and nature of the substantive content proposed and the way in which it should be sequenced. Analysis of these reactions provides an illuminating insight into history teachers’ perspectives. While the rationales that underpin their thinking seem to have connections to a variety of different theoretical models, the analysis suggests that more attention could usefully be devoted to the idea of developing frameworks of reference.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/49559
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/00220272.2015.1122091
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education > Improving Equity and Inclusion through Education
Uncontrolled Keywords history education; curriculum; history curriculum; secondary school curriculum
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar