Raz on rights: human rights, fundamental rights and balancing

[thumbnail of RightsRJ2015_revised.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Zanghellini, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-4941 (2017) Raz on rights: human rights, fundamental rights and balancing. Ratio Juris, 30 (1). pp. 25-40. ISSN 1467-9337 doi: 10.1111/raju.12156

Abstract/Summary

After clarifying the outlines of Raz’s interest theory of rights and its relationship to aspects of the principles theory of rights, I consider how his recent observations on human rights fit (or fail to fit) into the interest theory. I then address two questions. First, I elaborate on Raz’s definition of morally fundamental rights, arguing that he is right in claiming that there are no such rights. I then show that the interest theory accommodates the notion that rights may take qualitative precedence over conflicting considerations – a question that has become increasingly relevant in light of recent writing on rights.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/45898
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/raju.12156
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar