Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression by computer vs. therapist: patient experiences and therapeutic processes

[thumbnail of Gega et al (2013).pdf]
Gega et al (2013).pdf - Published Version (241kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gega, L., Smith, J. and Reynolds, S. (2013) Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression by computer vs. therapist: patient experiences and therapeutic processes. Psychotherapy Research, 23 (2). pp. 218-231. ISSN 1050-3307 doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.766941

Abstract/Summary

This case series compares patient experiences and therapeutic processes between two modalities of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression: computerized CBT (cCBT) and therapist-delivered CBT (tCBT). In a mixed-methods repeated-measures case series, six participants were offered cCBT and tCBT in sequence, with the order of delivery randomized across participants. Questionnaires about patient experiences were administered after each session and a semi-structured interview was completed with each participant at the end of each therapy modality. Therapy expectations, patient experiences and session impact ratings in this study generally favoured tCBT. Participants typically experienced cCBT sessions as less meaningful, less positive and less helpful compared to tCBT sessions in terms of developing understanding, facilitating problem-solving and building a therapeutic relationship.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/45289
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Charlie Waller Institute
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Anxiety and Depression in Young People (AnDY)
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar