Exploring reidentfication risk: is anonymization a promise we can keep?

[thumbnail of Paper 2.0 Anonymisation.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Nunan, D. and Di Domenico, M. (2015) Exploring reidentfication risk: is anonymization a promise we can keep? International Journal of Market Research, 58 (1). pp. 19-34. ISSN 1470-7853

Abstract/Summary

The anonymisation of personal data has multiple purposes within research: as a marker of ethical practice, a means of reducing regulation and as a safeguard for protecting respondent privacy. However, the growing capabilities of technology to gather and analyse data have raised concerns over the potential reidentification of anonymised datasets. This has sparked a wide-ranging debate among both academic researchers and policy makers as to whether anonymisation can continue to be relied upon. This debate has the potential to create important implications for market research. This paper analyses the key arguments both for and against anonymisation as an effective tool given the changing technological environment. We consider the future position of anonymisation and question whether anonymisation can retain its key role given the potential impact on both respondent trust and the nature of self-regulation within market research.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/44809
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Marketing and Reputation
Publisher The Market Research Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar