Translation practices in political institutions: a comparison of national, supranational, and non-governmental organisations

Download

[thumbnail of Perspectives_joint article_ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT.pdf]

Preview

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Schaeffner, C., Tcaciuc, L. S. and Tesseur, W. (2014) Translation practices in political institutions: a comparison of national, supranational, and non-governmental organisations. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 22 (4). pp. 493-510. ISSN 1747-6623 doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2014.948890

Abstract/Summary

This paper explores the settings and practices of translation at three types of political institutions, i.e. national, supranational, and non-governmental organisations. The three institutions are the translation service of the German Foreign Office, the translation department of the European Central Bank, and translation provision by the non-governmental organisation Amnesty International. The three case studies describe the specific translation practices in place at these institutions and illustrate some characteristic translation strategies. In this way, we reflect on how different translation practices can impact on translation agency and how these practices in turn are influenced by the type of institution and its organisational structure. The article also aims to explore to which extent the characteristics of collectivity, anonymity and standardisation, and of institutional translation as self-translation are applicable to the institutions under discussion.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/44097
Identification Number/DOI	10.1080/0907676X.2014.948890
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Uncontrolled Keywords	institutional translation, agency, translation service of the German Foreign Office, translation at the European Central Bank, translation provision for Amnesty International
Publisher	Routledge
Publisher Statement	This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Perspectives: Studies in Translatology on 9/10//14, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948890
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	22 Oct 2015 09:16	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	09 Jun 2024 03:58	Date item last modified

References

*De Vreese, C. (2005). News framing: theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. *Dobrotă, I. and Maftei, C. (2002). The metaphoric dimension of economic text: The translation of economic metaphors, Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica, 3 (2), pp. 313-320. *Gagnon, C. (2006). Language plurality as power struggle, or: Translating politics in Canada, Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, vol. 18, no 1, p. 69-90. *Jacobs, G. (1999). Preformulating the News: an Analysis of the Metapragmatics of Press Releases. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. *Kang, J.-H. (2008). Institutional translation. In M. Baker & G. Saldanha (Eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (2nd ed., pp. 141-145). Milton Park, Abigdon: Routledge. *Koskinen, K. (2008). Translating Institutions: An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome. *Koskinen, K. (2010). Agency and causality: Towards explaining by mechanisms in Translation Studies. In T. Kinnunen & K. Koskinen (Eds.), Translators’ Agency (pp. 165–187). Tampere: Tampere University Press. *Koskinen, K. (2011). Institutional translation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies 2 (pp. 54–60). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. *Mossop, B. (1988). Translating institutions: A missing factor in translation theory. TTR, 1(2), 65–71. *Mossop, B. (1990). Translating institutions and “idiomatic translation”. META, 35(2), 342–355. *Möckli, E. (2012). Danzig ist deutsch! - Goebbels in translation. In I. Herrero & T. Klaiman (Eds.), Versatility in Translation Studies: Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2011. Retrieved from http://www.arts.kuleuven.be/info/bestanden-div/MOCKLI.pdf *Peterson, J. and Shackleton, M.(2006). The Institutions of the European Union. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. *Pym, A. (2004). The use of translation in international organizations. In H. Kittel, A.P Frank, N. Greiner, et al. (Eds.), Übersetzung Translation Traduction. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Übersetzungsforschung (pp. 85–92). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. *Schäffner, C. (2012). Unknown agents in translated political discourse. Target, 24(1), 103–125. *Scheller, K. H. (2006). The European Central Bank: History, Role and Functions. Frankfurt: European Central Bank publications, second revised edition. *Tcaciuc, L. S. M.(2012). Translation Practices at the European Central Bank with Reference to Metaphors, unpublished PhD thesis, Birmingham: Aston University. *Tesseur, W. (2014). Amnesty International’s Language Strategy Put into Practice: A Case Study of the Translation of Press Releases. CETRA papers online. Retrieved from: http://www.arts.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/files/tesseur *Wong, W. H. (2012). Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. New York: Cornell University Press.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar