Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Van Reekum, C. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-1101, Johnstone, T., Banse, R., Etter, A., Wehrle, T. and Scherer, K. R. (2004) Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game. Cognition & Emotion, 18 (5). pp. 663-688. ISSN 0269-9931 doi: 10.1080/02699930341000167

Abstract/Summary

A computer game was used to study psychophysiological reactions to emotion-relevant events. Two dimensions proposed by Scherer (1984a, 1984b) in his appraisal theory, the intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness of game events, were studied in a factorial design. The relative level at which a player performed at the moment of an event was also taken into account. A total of 33 participants played the game while cardiac activity, skin conductance, skin temperature, and muscle activity as well as emotion self-reports were assessed. The self-reports indicate that game events altered levels of pride, joy, anger, and surprise. Goal conduciveness had little effect on muscle activity but was associated with significant autonomic effects, including changes to interbeat interval, pulse transit time, skin conductance, and finger temperature. The manipulation of intrinsic pleasantness had little impact on physiological responses. The results show the utility of attempting to manipulate emotion-constituent appraisals and measure their peripheral physiological signatures.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/4380
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/02699930341000167
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher Psychology Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar