Mens rea in joint enterprise: a role for endorsement?

[thumbnail of Mens Rea in Joint Enterprise %28accepted pre-proof version%29.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Krebs, B. (2015) Mens rea in joint enterprise: a role for endorsement? Cambridge Law Journal, 74 (3). pp. 480-504. ISSN 0008-1973 doi: 10.1017/S0008197315000677

Abstract/Summary

This paper argues that the problems commonly associated with the joint enterprise doctrine might be alleviated by supplementing the cognitive mens rea standard of foresight with a volitional element that looks to how the defendant related to the foreseen risk. A re-examination of the case law suggests that a mens rea conception of foresight plus endorsement might be within interpretative reach. The paper considers possible objections to such a development but ultimately rejects them. It concludes that it is not necessary to wait for Parliament to put in place reforms: joint enterprise is a creature of the common law, and the common law is able to tame it unaided.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/42081
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/S0008197315000677
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar