Expecting moral philosophers to be reliable

Andow, J. (2015) Expecting moral philosophers to be reliable. Dialectica, 69 (2). pp. 205-220. ISSN 1746-8361 doi: 10.1111/1746-8361.12092

Abstract/Summary

Are philosophers’ intuitions more reliable than philosophical novices’? Are we entitled to assume the superiority of philosophers’ intuitions just as we assume that experts in other domains have more reliable intuitions than novices? Ryberg raises some doubts and his arguments promise to undermine the expertise defence of intuition-use in philosophy once and for all. In this paper, I raise a number of objections to these arguments. I argue that philosophers receive sufficient feedback about the quality of their intuitions and that philosophers’ experience in philosophy plausibly affects their intuitions. Consequently, the type of argument Ryberg offers fails to undermine the expertise defence of intuition-use in philosophy.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/42079
Identification Number/DOI	10.1111/1746-8361.12092
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher	Wiley
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item