Tenenbaum and Raffaman on vague projects, the Self-Torturer, and the sorites

[thumbnail of Elson - 2016 - Tenenbaum and Raffman on Vague Projects, the Self-Torturer, and the Sorites.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of TenRaf.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Elson, L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-8030 (2016) Tenenbaum and Raffaman on vague projects, the Self-Torturer, and the sorites. Ethics, 126 (2). pp. 474-488. ISSN 1539-297X doi: 10.1086/683533

Abstract/Summary

Sergio Tenenbaum and Diana Raffman contend that ‘vague projects’ motivate radical revisions to orthodox, utility-maximising rational choice theory. Their argument cannot succeed if such projects merely ground instances of the paradox of the sorites, or heap. Tenenbaum and Raffman are not blind to this, and argue that Warren Quinn’s Puzzle of the Self-Torturer does not rest on the sorites. I argue that their argument both fails to generalise to most vague projects, and is ineffective in the case of the Self-Torturer itself.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/39849
Identification Number/DOI 10.1086/683533
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher University of Chicago Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar