Do consumers want public or private bodies to monitor animal friendly production and marketing schemes? And does trust matter?

[thumbnail of Boecker_Nocella_Scarpa_2006.pdf]
Text
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Boecker, A., Nocella, G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-6315 and Scarpa, R. (2006) Do consumers want public or private bodies to monitor animal friendly production and marketing schemes? And does trust matter? In: 99th EAAE Seminar, Trust and Risk in Business Networks, February 8-10, Bonn.

Abstract/Summary

Producing according to enhanced farm animal welfare (FAW) standards increases costs along the livestock value chain, especially for monitoring certified animal friendly products. In the choice between public or private bodies for carrying out and monitoring certification, consumer preferences and trust play a role. We explore this issue by applying logit analysis involving socio-economic and psychometric variables to survey data from Italy. Results identify marked consumer preferences for public bodies and trust in stakeholders a key determinant.

Item Type Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/39779
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar