The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: a field study approach

[thumbnail of JA The Adoption of the Materiality Concept in Social and Environmental Reporting Assurance.docx]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of JA The Adoption of the Materiality Concept in Social and Environmental Reporting Assurance.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Edgley, C. R., Jones, M. J. and Atkins, J. (2015) The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: a field study approach. The British Accounting Review, 47 (1). pp. 1-18. ISSN 0890-8389 doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.11.001

Abstract/Summary

This study investigates the logics or values that shape the social and environmental reporting (SER) and SER assurance (SERA) process. The influence of logics is observed through a study of the conceptualisation and operationalisation of the materiality concept by accounting and non-accounting assurors and their assurance statements. We gathered qualitative data from interviews with both accounting and non-accounting assurors. We analysed the interplay between old and new logics that are shaping materiality as a reporting concept in SER. SER is a rich field in which to study the dynamics of change because it is a voluntary, unregulated, qualitative reporting arena. It has a broad, stakeholder audience, where accounting and non-accounting organisations are in competition. There are three key findings. First, the introduction of a new, stakeholder logic has significantly changed the meaning and role of materiality. Second, a more versatile, performative, social understanding of materiality was portrayed by assurors, with a forward-looking rather than a historic focus. Third, competing logics have encouraged different beliefs about materiality, and practices, to develop. This influenced the way assurors theorised the concept and interpreted outcomes. A patchwork of localised understandings of materiality is developing. Policy implications both in SERA and also in financial audit are explored.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/38970
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.bar.2014.11.001
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting
Uncontrolled Keywords Institutional logics; Materiality; Social and Environmental Reporting Assurance (SERA)
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar