The prevention of infiltration (amendment no. 4) bill: a malevolent response to the Israeli Supreme Court judgment

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Ziegler, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6173-441X (2013) The prevention of infiltration (amendment no. 4) bill: a malevolent response to the Israeli Supreme Court judgment. European Society of International Law Migration & Refugee Law Interest Group Blog.

Abstract/Summary

The blog-post critically analyses the (at the time proposed) Prevention of Infiltration bill (Amendment no. 4), following the quashing by the Israeli Supreme Court of Amendment no. 3 (in HCJ 7146/12 Adam v. the Knesset et al). It is contended that the legislation is more draconian than its quashed predecessor considering (a) the virtual halt in new entrants (b) the explicit recognition of the non-deportability of prospective detainees (c) the pretence of referring to the detention centre as ‘open’ (d) the absence of judicial oversight.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/38068
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar