Is the future of electoral reform local?

[thumbnail of Renwick%2C ERS reform papers%2C final correct text%2C 2014-10.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Renwick, A. (2014) Is the future of electoral reform local? The Political Quarterly, 85 (3). pp. 368-372. ISSN 1467-923X doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12105

Abstract/Summary

The Electoral Reform Society has recently published two reports putting the case for electoral reform in local government. These suggest acceptance, in the wake of defeat in the 2011 Alternative Vote referendum, that the group’s ultimate goal of change to the Westminster electoral system is unlikely to be fulfilled soon and that a more gradual strategy is therefore needed. This paper examines this shift by asking three questions. First, is Westminster electoral reform really a dead letter? Second, is local electoral reform more likely—and, if so, just how much more likely? Third, would local electoral reform matter in itself?

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/38058
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/1467-923X.12105
Refereed No
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Uncontrolled Keywords Keywords: electoral reform;local elections;single transferable vote;STV;Labour;Conservatives
Publisher Blackwell
Publisher Statement The definitive version is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar