Communication costs and the boundaries of the firm

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Casson, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-6538 and Wadeson, N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-9307 (1998) Communication costs and the boundaries of the firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5 (1). pp. 5-27. ISSN 1466-1829 doi: 10.1080/13571519884549

Abstract/Summary

Much has been written about where the boundaries of the firm are drawn, but little about what occurs at the boundaries themselves. When a firm subcontracts, does it inform its suppliers fully of what it requires, or is it willing to accept what they have available? In practice firms often engage in a dialogue, or conversation, with their suppliers, in which at first they set out their general requirements, and only when the supplier reports back on how these can be met are their more specific requirements set out. This paper models such conversations as a rational response to communication costs. The model is used to examine the impact of new information technology, such as CAD/CAM, on the conduct of subcontracting. It can also be used to examine its impact on the marketing activities of firms. The technique of analysis, which is based on the economic theory of teams, has more general applications too. It can be used to model all the forms of dialogue involved in the processes of coordination both within and between firms.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/37811
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/13571519884549
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Routledge
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar