Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Differential brain activity during emotional versus nonemotional reversal learning

[thumbnail of NashiroSakakiNgaMatherJoCN2012.pdf]
Preview
NashiroSakakiNgaMatherJoCN2012.pdf - Accepted Version (773kB) | Preview
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Nashiro, K., Sakaki, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-5765, Nga, L. and Mather, M. (2012) Differential brain activity during emotional versus nonemotional reversal learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (8). pp. 1794-1805. ISSN 0898-929X doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00245

Abstract/Summary

The ability to change an established stimulus–behavior association based on feedback is critical for adaptive social behaviors. This ability has been examined in reversal learning tasks, where participants first learn a stimulus–response association (e.g., select a particular object to get a reward) and then need to alter their response when reinforcement contingencies change. Although substantial evidence demonstrates that the OFC is a critical region for reversal learning, previous studies have not distinguished reversal learning for emotional associations from neutral associations. The current study examined whether OFC plays similar roles in emotional versus neutral reversal learning. The OFC showed greater activity during reversals of stimulus–outcome associations for negative outcomes than for neutral outcomes. Similar OFC activity was also observed during reversals involving positive outcomes. Furthermore, OFC activity is more inversely correlated with amygdala activity during negative reversals than during neutral reversals. Overall, our results indicate that the OFC is more activated by emotional than neutral reversal learning and that OFC's interactions with the amygdala are greater for negative than neutral reversal learning.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/36913
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher M I T Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar