Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing

[thumbnail of SakakiGorlickMather_Emotion2011.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Sakaki, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-5765, Gorlick, M. A. and Mather, M. (2011) Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing. Emotion, 11 (6). pp. 1263-1278. ISSN 1931-1516 doi: 10.1037/a0026329

Abstract/Summary

Past studies have revealed that encountering negative events interferes with cognitive processing of subsequent stimuli. The present study investigates whether negative events affect semantic and perceptual processing differently. Presentation of negative pictures produced slower reaction times than neutral or positive pictures in tasks that require semantic processing, such as natural or man-made judgments about drawings of objects, commonness judgments about objects, and categorical judgments about pairs of words. In contrast, negative picture presentation did not slow down judgments in subsequent perceptual processing (e.g., color judgments about words, size judgments about objects). The subjective arousal level of negative pictures did not modulate the interference effects on semantic or perceptual processing. These findings indicate that encountering negative emotional events interferes with semantic processing of subsequent stimuli more strongly than perceptual processing, and that not all types of subsequent cognitive processing are impaired by negative events.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/36899
Identification Number/DOI 10.1037/a0026329
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher American Psychological Association
Publisher Statement This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar