Low-cost momentum strategies

[thumbnail of 36097.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Li, X., Brooks, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-1153 and Miffre, J. (2009) Low-cost momentum strategies. Journal of Asset Management, 9 (6). pp. 366-379. ISSN 1470-8272 doi: 10.1057/jam.2008.28

Abstract/Summary

This paper analyses the impact of trading costs on the profitability of momentum strategies in the United Kingdom and concludes that losers are more expensive to trade than winners. The observed asymmetry in the costs of trading winners and losers crucially relates to the high cost of selling loser stocks with small size and low trading volume. Since transaction costs severely impact net momentum profits, the paper defines a new low-cost relative-strength strategy by shortlisting from all winner and loser stocks those with the lowest total transaction costs. While the study severely questions the profitability of standard momentum strategies, it concludes that there is still room for momentum-based return enhancement, should asset managers decide to adopt low-cost relative-strength strategies.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/36097
Identification Number/DOI 10.1057/jam.2008.28
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar