Why Lex30 may not be an improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2

Download

Full text not archived in this repository.

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Clenton, J. (2005) Why Lex30 may not be an improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. Studies in Language and Culture, 31. pp. 47-59. ISSN 0387-4478

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35919
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics
Publisher	Osaka University Press
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item