Clements, M. P.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 and Hendry, D. F.
(2002)
Modelling methodology and forecast failure.
Econometrics Journal, 5 (2).
pp. 319-344.
ISSN 1368-423X
doi: 10.1111/1368-423X.00086
Abstract/Summary
We analyse by simulation the impact of model-selection strategies (sometimes called pre-testing) on forecast performance in both constant-and non-constant-parameter processes. Restricted, unrestricted and selected models are compared when either of the first two might generate the data. We find little evidence that strategies such as general-to-specific induce significant over-fitting, or thereby cause forecast-failure rejection rates to greatly exceed nominal sizes. Parameter non-constancies put a premium on correct specification, but in general, model-selection effects appear to be relatively small, and progressive research is able to detect the mis-specifications.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35217 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1111/1368-423X.00086 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download