Modelling methodology and forecast failure

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 and Hendry, D. F. (2002) Modelling methodology and forecast failure. Econometrics Journal, 5 (2). pp. 319-344. ISSN 1368-423X doi: 10.1111/1368-423X.00086

Abstract/Summary

We analyse by simulation the impact of model-selection strategies (sometimes called pre-testing) on forecast performance in both constant-and non-constant-parameter processes. Restricted, unrestricted and selected models are compared when either of the first two might generate the data. We find little evidence that strategies such as general-to-specific induce significant over-fitting, or thereby cause forecast-failure rejection rates to greatly exceed nominal sizes. Parameter non-constancies put a premium on correct specification, but in general, model-selection effects appear to be relatively small, and progressive research is able to detect the mis-specifications.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35217
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/1368-423X.00086
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar