Clements, M.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 and Taylor, N.
(2001)
Robust evaluation of fixed-event forecast rationality.
Journal of Forecasting, 20.
pp. 285-295.
ISSN 1099-131X
doi: 10.1002/for.806
Abstract/Summary
In this paper we introduce a new testing procedure for evaluating the rationality of fixed-event forecasts based on a pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator. The procedure is designed to be robust to departures in the normality assumption. A model is introduced to show that such departures are likely when forecasters experience a credibility loss when they make large changes to their forecasts. The test is illustrated using monthly fixed-event forecasts produced by four UK institutions. Use of the robust test leads to the conclusion that certain forecasts are rational while use of the Gaussian-based test implies that certain forecasts are irrational. The difference in the results is due to the nature of the underlying data. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35212 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1002/for.806 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download