Dominance in the Tetra Pak case: an empirical approach

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Garcia-Gallego, A. and Georgantzis, N. (1999) Dominance in the Tetra Pak case: an empirical approach. European Journal of Law and Economics, 7 (2). pp. 137-161. ISSN 0929-1261 doi: 10.1023/A:1008657326185

Abstract/Summary

The 1991 decision of the European Commission on the Tetra Pak case was based on information which seemed to prove the firm's anti-competitive behavior. The Tetra Pak case is investigated here focusing on the meaning of multimarket dominance, using empirical techniques. We find that a more rigorous analysis of the data available would not confirm the Commission's assertions. That is, it cannot be concluded with certainty that the Commission was right to relate Tetra Pak's dominance in the aseptic sector to its market power in the non-aseptic sector. Our results suggest a general framework for the analysis of abusive transfer of market power across vertically or/and horizontally related markets.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/34796
Identification Number/DOI 10.1023/A:1008657326185
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar