An experimental test of response consistency in contingent valuation

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Camacho-Cuena, E., Garcia-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N. and Sabater-Grande, G. (2003) An experimental test of response consistency in contingent valuation. Ecological Economics, 47 (2-3). pp. 167-182. ISSN 09218009 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00192-7

Abstract/Summary

We compare hypothetical and observed (experimental) willingness to pay (WTP) for a gradual improvement in the environmental performance of a marketed good (an office table). First, following usual practices in marketing research, subjects’ stated WTP for the improvement is obtained. Second, the same subjects participate in a real reward experiment designed to replicate the scenario valued in the hypothetical question. Our results show that, independently of the degree of the improvement, there are no significant median differences between stated and experimental data. However, subjects reporting extreme values of WTP (low or high) exhibit a more moderate behavior in the experiment.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/34788
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00192-7
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar