Pro-competitive price beating guarantees: experimental evidence

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Fatas, E., Georgantzis, N., Mañez, J. A. and Sabater-Grande, G. (2005) Pro-competitive price beating guarantees: experimental evidence. Review of Industrial Organization, 26 (1). pp. 115-136. ISSN 0889-938X doi: 10.1007/s11151-004-6614-2

Abstract/Summary

We report experimental results on duopoly pricing with and without price beating guarantees (PBG). In two control treatments, price beating is either imposed as an industry-wide rule or offered as a business strategy. Our major finding is that when price beating guarantees are imposed as a rule or offered as an option, effective prices are equal to or lower than those in a baseline treatment in which price beating is forbidden. Also, when price beating is treated as a business strategy, less than 50% of subjects adopted the guarantee, suggesting that, subjects realize the pro-competitive effects of the guarantee.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/34786
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s11151-004-6614-2
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar