Metaphors in complexity theory and planning

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Chettiparamb, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-5725 (2006) Metaphors in complexity theory and planning. Planning Theory, 5 (1). pp. 71-91. ISSN 1741-3052 doi: 10.1177/1473095206061022

Abstract/Summary

This article reviews the use of complexity theory in planning theory using the theory of metaphors for theory transfer and theory construction. The introduction to the article presents the author's positioning of planning theory. The first section thereafter provides a general background of the trajectory of development of complexity theory and discusses the rationale of using the theory of metaphors for evaluating the use of complexity theory in planning. The second section introduces the workings of metaphors in general and theory-constructing metaphors in particular, drawing out an understanding of how to proceed with an evaluative approach towards an analysis of the use of complexity theory in planning. The third section presents two case studies – reviews of two articles – to illustrate how the framework might be employed. It then discusses the implications of the evaluation for the question ‘can complexity theory contribute to planning?’ The concluding section discusses the employment of the ‘theory of metaphors’ for evaluating theory transfer and draws out normative suggestions for engaging in theory transfer using the metaphorical route.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/32892
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/1473095206061022
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Publisher Sage
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar