Transition from an anti-phase error-correction-mode to a synchronization mode in the mutual hand tracking

Lists

Download

Preview

PhysRevE_88_022704.pdf - Published Version (612kB) | Preview

Tools

Hayashi, Y. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-6322 and Sawada, Y. (2013) Transition from an anti-phase error-correction-mode to a synchronization mode in the mutual hand tracking. Physical Review E, 88 (2). 022704. ISSN 1539-3755 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.022704

Abstract/Summary

Proactive motion in hand tracking and in finger bending, in which the body motion occurs prior to the reference signal, was reported by the preceding researchers when the target signals were shown to the subjects at relatively high speed or high frequencies. These phenomena indicate that the human sensory-motor system tends to choose an anticipatory mode rather than a reactive mode, when the target motion is relatively fast. The present research was undertaken to study what kind of mode appears in the sensory-motor system when two persons were asked to track the hand position of the partner with each other at various mean tracking frequency. The experimental results showed a transition from a mutual error-correction mode to a synchronization mode occurred in the same region of the tracking frequency with that of the transition from a reactive error-correction mode to a proactive anticipatory mode in the mechanical target tracking experiments. Present research indicated that synchronization of body motion occurred only when both of the pair subjects operated in a proactive anticipatory mode. We also presented mathematical models to explain the behavior of the error-correction mode and the synchronization mode.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information	This work was supported by The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (Mobiligence), No. 18047010.
Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/31708
Item Type	Article
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Department of Bio-Engineering
Additional Information	This work was supported by The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (Mobiligence), No. 18047010.
Publisher	American Physical Society
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	21 Mar 2013 16:39	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	30 Jun 2024 01:09	Date item last modified

References

[1] R. C. Miall, D. J. Weir, and J. F. Stein, Behav. Brain Res., 20, 185 (1986). [2] D. A. Robinson, J. L. Gordon, and S. E. Gordon, Biol. Cybern. 55, 43 (1986). TABLE I: Summary of mode transition in each paradigm, tracking and tapping experiments: the intermittent-visible target was employed for both PC-programmed and mutual tracking experiments as described in references. Experimental paradigm Mode transition [Transition frequency] Tracking PC-programmed target tracking [15]: Reactive error-correction to Proactive anticipatory [0.3 Hz] Mutual tracking [present study]: Mutual error-correction to Synchronization [0.3 Hz] Tapping PC-programmed target tapping [13]: Reactive error-correction to Proactive anticipatory [0.5-0.7 Hz] Mutual tapping [present study]: Mutual error-correction to Synchronization [0.5-0.7 Hz] [3] D. Wolpert, R. C. Miall, and M. Kawato, Trends Cogn. Sci., 2-9, 338 (1998). [4] M. R. Matau�sek and A. D. Mici�c, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 41-8, 1199 (1996). [5] K. J. Astrom, C. C. Hang, and B. C. Lim, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 39-2, 343 (1994). [6] M. Jeannerod, M. A. Arbib, G. Rizzolatti, and H. Sakata, Trends Neurosci., 18, 314 (1995). [7] Y. Paulignan, C. MacKenzie, R. Marteniuk, and M. Jeannerod, Exp. Brain Res., 83, 502 (1991). [8] C. M. Harris and D. M. Wolpert, Nature, 394, 780 (1998). [9] T. Tsuji, P. G. Morasso, K. Goto, and K. Ito, Biol. Cybern., 72, 475 (1995). [10] S. Hong, J. Kim, M. Sato, and Y. Koike, J. IEICE, 10, 1246 (2005). [11] I. Miyake, Studies From the Yale Psychological Laboratory, 10, 1 (1902). [12] B. H. Repp, Psychonomic Bull. & Rev., 12-6, 969 (2005). [13] D. A. Engstr�om, J.A. S. Kelso, and T. Holroyd, Hum. Mov. Sci., 15, 809 (1996). [14] F. Ishida and Y. Sawada, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 168105 (2004). [15] Y. Hayashi, Y. Tamura, K. Sase, K. Sugawara, and Y. Sawada, The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 46-7, 391 (2010). [16] Y. Hayashi, Y. Tamura, K. Sugawara, and Y. Sawada, Proc. of The 3rd Int. Symp. on Mobiligence, 34 (2009). [17] A. J. Suminski, D. C. Tkach, A. H. Fagg, and N. G. Hatsopoulos, J. Neurosci., 30-50, 16777 (2010). [18] H. U. Voss, Phys. Rev. E, 61, 5115 (2000). [19] N. Stepp, Exp. Brain Res., 198, 521 (2009). [20] J. A. Nessler and S. J. Gilliland, Hum. Mov. Sci., 28, 772 (2009). [21] J. A. Nessler and S. J. Gilliland, Gait and posture, 31, 527 (2010). [22] G. Rizzolatti and L. Craighero, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 169 (2004). [23] U. Ernst, K. Pawelzik, and T. Geisel, Phys. Rev. E, 74, 1570 (1995). [24] Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbu- lence, (Springer, Berlin, 1984). [25] A. T. Winfree, J. Theor. Biol., 16, 15 (1967). [26] K. Nakajima and Y. Sawada, J. Chem. Phys., 72, 2231 (1980). [27] J. A. S. Kelso, Bull. Psychonomic Soc., 18, 63 (1981). [28] H. Haken, J. A. S. Kelso, and H. Bunz, Biol. Cybern., 347 (1985).

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar