Borg, E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-9568
(2013)
More questions for mirror neurons.
Consciousness and Cognition, 22 (3).
pp. 1122-1131.
ISSN 1053-8100
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.013
Abstract/Summary
The mirror neuron system is widely held to provide direct access to the motor goals of others. This paper critically investigates this idea, focusing on the so-called ‘intentional worry’. I explore two answers to the intentional worry: first that the worry is premised on too limited an understanding of mirror neuron behaviour (Sections 2 and 3), second that the appeal made to mirror neurons can be refined in such a way as to avoid the worry (Section 4). I argue that the first response requires an account of the mechanism by which small-scale gestures are supposedly mapped to larger chains of actions but that none of the extant accounts of this mechanism are plausible. Section 4 then briefly examines refinements of the mirror neuron-mindreading hypothesis which avoid the intentional worry. I conclude that these refinements may well be plausible but that they undermine many of the claims standardly made for mirror neurons.
Altmetric Badge
Item Type | Article |
URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/31256 |
Item Type | Article |
Refereed | Yes |
Divisions | Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Cognition Research (CCR) Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record