Joint criminal enterprise

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Krebs, B. (2010) Joint criminal enterprise. Modern Law Review, 73 (4). pp. 578-604. ISSN 0026-7961 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00809.x

Abstract/Summary

The doctrine of joint criminal enterprise is in disarray. Despite repeated judicial scrutiny at the highest level, the doctrine's scope, proper doctrinal basis and function in relation to other modes of complicity remain uncertain. This article examines the doctrine's elements and underlying principles. It argues that while joint criminal enterprise is largely used to make individuals liable for offences committed by their associates in excess of the common criminal purpose, its proper function is to police the limits of associate liability and thus to exculpate rather than inculpate. The doctrine governs not only instances of accessorial liability; it also applies where the parties involved are joint principal offenders. As this puts into question the prevalent view that joint criminal enterprise is a form of secondary participation that results in accessorial liability, the article concludes that it is best seen as a doctrine sui generis.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/29668
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00809.x
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar