Hyperactive governance in the Thames Gateway

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Catney, P., Dixon, T. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-6337 and Henneberry, T. (2008) Hyperactive governance in the Thames Gateway. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal , 2 (2). pp. 124-145. ISSN 1752-9638

Abstract/Summary

This paper examines the implementation of brownfield regeneration policies in the UK within the context of complex systems of multi-level governance. Using the regeneration of the Thames Gateway as an example, it explores how the Government's centrally driven institutional arrangements have undermined leadership in this key development project. The Government's approach to brownfield governance is characterised as one of constant intervention in the Thames Gateway in an ad hoc and incoherent fashion. Congested and fragmented governance structures are the result. These, this paper argues, have diffused the focus and undermined the leadership of policy and implementation. It is suggested that the adoption of the principles of policy mapping and weaving would bring more clarity and coherence to the governance of the Thames Gateway.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/28828
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Urban Living group
Publisher Henry Stewart Publications LLP
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar