Reasons, impossibility and efficient steps: reply to Heuer

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Streumer, B. (2010) Reasons, impossibility and efficient steps: reply to Heuer. Philosophical Studies, 151 (1). pp. 79-86. ISSN 1573-0883 doi: 10.1007/s11098-009-9422-6

Abstract/Summary

Ulrike Heuer argues that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action that this person cannot perform, as long as this person can take efficient steps towards performing this action. In this reply, I first argue that Heuer’s examples fail to undermine my claim that there cannot be a reason for a person to perform an action if it is impossible that this person will perform this action. I then argue that, on a plausible interpretation of what ‘efficient steps’ are, Heuer’s claim is consistent with my claim. I end by showing that Heuer fails to undermine the arguments I gave for my claim.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/28724
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9422-6
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Uncontrolled Keywords Reasons for action - Impossibility
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar