Cromartie, A.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9558-8081
(2012)
Field manual 3-24 and the heritage of counterinsurgency theory.
Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41 (1).
pp. 91-111.
ISSN 1477-9021
doi: 10.1177/0305829812451973
Abstract/Summary
The Counterinsurgency Manual FM 3-24 has been accused of being over-dependent on the counterinsurgency 'classics' Galula and Thompson. But comparison reveals that it is different in spirit. Galula and Thompson seek practical control; the Manual seeks to build 'legitimacy'. Its concept of legitimacy is superficially Weberian, but owes more to the writings of the American Max Manwaring. The Manual presupposes that a rights-based legal order can (other things being equal) be made to be cross-culturally attractive; 'effective governance' by itself can build legitimacy. The fusion of its methods with an ideology creates unrealistic criteria for success. Its weaknesses suggest a level of incapacity to think politically that will, in time, result in further failures.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/28549 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1177/0305829812451973 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations |
| Uncontrolled Keywords | counterinsurgency; Field Manual; Galula; legitimacy; Petraeus; Thompson |
| Publisher | Sage Publications |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download