Improvement of 3D protein models using multiple templates guided by single-template model quality assessment

Buenavista, M. T., Roche, D. B. and McGuffin, L. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-4767 (2012) Improvement of 3D protein models using multiple templates guided by single-template model quality assessment. Bioinformatics, 28 (14). pp. 1851-1857. ISSN 1460-2059 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts292

Abstract/Summary

Motivation: Modelling the 3D structures of proteins can often be enhanced if more than one fold template is used during the modelling process. However, in many cases, this may also result in poorer model quality for a given target or alignment method. There is a need for modelling protocols that can both consistently and significantly improve 3D models and provide an indication of when models might not benefit from the use of multiple target-template alignments. Here, we investigate the use of both global and local model quality prediction scores produced by ModFOLDclust2, to improve the selection of target-template alignments for the construction of multiple-template models. Additionally, we evaluate clustering the resulting population of multi- and single-template models for the improvement of our IntFOLD-TS tertiary structure prediction method. Results: We find that using accurate local model quality scores to guide alignment selection is the most consistent way to significantly improve models for each of the sequence to structure alignment methods tested. In addition, using accurate global model quality for re-ranking alignments, prior to selection, further improves the majority of multi-template modelling methods tested. Furthermore, subsequent clustering of the resulting population of multiple-template models significantly improves the quality of selected models compared with the previous version of our tertiary structure prediction method, IntFOLD-TS.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/28153
Item Type	Article
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Biomedical Sciences
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item