Agricultural tenancy reform: the end of law; or a new popular culture?

[thumbnail of 0397.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gibbard, R. and Ravenscroft, N., (1997) Agricultural tenancy reform: the end of law; or a new popular culture? Working Papers in Land Management & Development. 03/97. Working Paper. University of Reading, Reading. pp24.

Abstract/Summary

This paper applies a reading of the postmodernisation of law to the incremental reform of agricultural holdings legislation over the last century. In charting the shifting legal basis of agricultural tenancies, from ‘black letter’ positivism to the cultural contextuality of sumptuary law, the paper theorises that the underlying political imperative has been allied to the changing significance of property ownership and use. Rather than reflecting the long-term official desire to maintain the let sector in British agriculture, however, the paper argues that this process has had other aims. In particular, it has been about an annexation of law to legitimise the retention of landowner power while presenting a rhetorical ‘democratisation’ of farming, away from its plutocratic associations and towards a new narrative of ‘depersonalised’ business.

Item Type Report (Working Paper)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/27221
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Publisher University of Reading
Publisher Statement The copyright of each working paper remains with the author. If you wish to quote from or cite any paper please contact the appropriate author; in some cases a more recent version of the paper may have been published elsewhere.
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar