Cheap dates and the delusion of gratification: are votes sold or traded in the EU Council of Ministers?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Golub, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-139X (2012) Cheap dates and the delusion of gratification: are votes sold or traded in the EU Council of Ministers? Journal of European Public Policy, 19 (2). pp. 141-160. ISSN 1466-4429 doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.599996

Abstract/Summary

Each year, small Member States receive a disproportionate share of the European Union's (EU's) budget. A prominent explanation for this is that Council decision-making involves a healthy dose of vote selling, whereby large Member States offer small states generous fiscal transfers in exchange for influence over policy. But nobody has investigated whether net budget contributors actually get anything for their money. In this paper I identify the vote selling model's observable implications and find virtually no evidence consistent with Council cash-for-votes exchanges. I also show that a compromise model – the leading model of EU decision-making to date – modified to incorporate vote selling does not outperform a standard one that assumes votes are traded rather than sold. Taken together, the results suggest that Council decision-making operates with little or no vote selling, and that regardless of whatever they think they might be buying, net budget contributors get little or nothing in return for their money. These findings call for further investigation into how Member States approach the issue of fiscal transfers, and into the factors other than formal voting weight that affect the power of actors engaged in EU decision-making.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/25383
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/13501763.2011.599996
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Uncontrolled Keywords Budget, compromise, decision-making, European Union, fiscal transfers, vote trading
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar